sysadminforum
Go Back   sysadminforum > Usenet Gateway > alt.* > alt.os.linux.* > alt.os.linux.suse
Reload this Page Fun Problem
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2008, 03:10 AM   #11
Paul J Gans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

F8BOE <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:

>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> slower.
>>
>> Any ideas why?
>>
>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>


>No, because we don't know if you use 32 or 64 bits

32 bits.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:11 AM   #12
Paul J Gans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

Pete Puma <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:

>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> slower.
>>
>> Any ideas why?
>>
>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>

>I think it's important to keep the same timing-pairs in the same paired
>slots.
>If you're using the older ram mixed with new RAM, try with just 2 gigs of the
>new stuff in slots 1+3 or 2+4 and time it. I'd be curious if it went
>quicker. On the second reboot I'd bet it runs quicker.

I've used matched pairs. Both pairs bought together from
the same vendor.

>Plus--you have an Asus. You can overclock it a bit easily...

Yes. I know. But it is taking linux a lot longer to
go through the startup lists.

Once booted, the machine seems as fast as usual though.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:13 AM   #13
Paul J Gans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

paul_0090 <> wrote:
>On 2008-12-01, Paul J Gans <> wrote:
>> Bill <> wrote:
>>>In article <ggviap$ldu$>, says...
>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>> slower.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas why?
>>>>
>>>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>>>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> If it takes X amount of time to chexk 1GB of ram, don't you think it
>>>would take 4X that amount of time to check 4GB of ram?
>>
>> No no. I'm talking about the time to boot linux, not the time
>> the bios spends mucking about.
>>
>>>Pus, if your
>>>using 4 sticks of ram most motherboards will slow down the speed of
>>>the ram.
>>
>> That's something I shall check out. Thanks.
>>
>I did read, at one point, that some MB don't like ram on the last 2 slots,
>i.e the "2nd bank"; you might want to verify that is what is causing the
>slowdown. It's the reason that I got 4 gb on 2 sticks, upgrading from
>2 gb; of course the ram had come down much in price & with a very good
>rebate (it was to be for $10 but got a check for $25).

Another good point. When I get a chance I'll yank 2 gigs.
The machine lives in a fairly inaccessible corner and I
can't just drag it out without some preparation.

Besides, I couldn't be typing this if the machine was
turned off... ;-)
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:18 AM   #14
Paul J Gans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

Bill <> wrote:
>In article <gh173u$svi$>, says...
>> Bill <> wrote:
>> >In article <ggviap$ldu$>, says...
>> >> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> >> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> >> slower.
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas why?
>> >>
>> >> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> >> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > If it takes X amount of time to chexk 1GB of ram, don't you think it
>> >would take 4X that amount of time to check 4GB of ram?
>>
>> No no. I'm talking about the time to boot linux, not the time
>> the bios spends mucking about.

> Ah. Details count. Boot up to me means from the time you hit the
>power button till the time you enter your name and password.

Sorry.


>>
>> >Pus, if your
>> >using 4 sticks of ram most motherboards will slow down the speed of
>> >the ram.
>>
>> That's something I shall check out. Thanks.

> Also there may be a setting in the bios involving PAE that may or
>may not help. Also maybe this will help:

> http://kerneltrap.org/node/2450

I'll check in the bios, but I don't think so.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 03:18 AM   #15
Paul J Gans
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

Baron <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:

>> marrgol <> wrote:
>>>On 2008-12-01 03:31, Paul J Gans wrote:
>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>> slower.
>>
>>>Which part of the boot process is slower? If it's before
>>>Linux kernel loads, then you might try to look for a "Quick
>>>Boot" option in your mo-bo setup and enable it - as Bill
>>>wrote, testing 4GB of RAM takes longer than 1GB. If it's
>>>Linux that loads slowly then make sure you are using
>>>kernel-bigsmp and not kernel-default.
>>
>> I'm talking about booting linux, not the bios stuff.
>> The machine is not a new one. It has been running linux
>> for some years. A few days ago I decided to change the
>> RAM in the machine from 1 Gb (two 512Mb sticks) to 4 Gb
>> (four 1 Gb sticks).
>>
>> The slowdown became instantly obvious. I allow the various
>> booting messgages to flow over the screen. In the past I
>> could barely read them as they "flowed" too quickly. Now
>> I can read and reread them as they "ooze" by.

>There are a great number of mainboards that get slower when you put in
>second, third and fourth sticks. Use memtest to see the measured
>speed !

Thanks. That's ugly, since the manual makes no mention of it.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:59 AM   #16
Shmuel Metz
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

In <MPG.239dfc20330bc933989ad0@localhost>, on 12/01/2008
at 01:51 PM, Bill <> said:

> Ah. Details count. Boot up to me means from the time you hit the power
>button till the time you enter your name and password.

What is the reset button, chopped liver? To say nothing of shutdown with
reboot.
__________________
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>

Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2008, 11:21 PM   #17
Baron
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fun Problem

Paul J Gans wrote:

> Baron <> wrote:
>>Paul J Gans wrote:
>
>>> marrgol <> wrote:
>>>>On 2008-12-01 03:31, Paul J Gans wrote:
>>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>>> slower.
>>>
>>>>Which part of the boot process is slower? If it's before
>>>>Linux kernel loads, then you might try to look for a "Quick
>>>>Boot" option in your mo-bo setup and enable it - as Bill
>>>>wrote, testing 4GB of RAM takes longer than 1GB. If it's
>>>>Linux that loads slowly then make sure you are using
>>>>kernel-bigsmp and not kernel-default.
>>>
>>> I'm talking about booting linux, not the bios stuff.
>>> The machine is not a new one. It has been running linux
>>> for some years. A few days ago I decided to change the
>>> RAM in the machine from 1 Gb (two 512Mb sticks) to 4 Gb
>>> (four 1 Gb sticks).
>>>
>>> The slowdown became instantly obvious. I allow the various
>>> booting messgages to flow over the screen. In the past I
>>> could barely read them as they "flowed" too quickly. Now
>>> I can read and reread them as they "ooze" by.
>
>>There are a great number of mainboards that get slower when you put in
>>second, third and fourth sticks. Use memtest to see the measured
>>speed !
>
> Thanks. That's ugly, since the manual makes no mention of it.
>
I assume you mean the mainboard manual ! I've never seen memory
slowdown mentioned either. I assure you it does occur even with
matched pairs and/or paging turned on or off.

Memtest will show you the speed whilst its testing. If you make a note
and change the configuration, run memtest again you will see !
__________________
Best Regards:
Baron.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



© 2004 - 2009 sysadminforum.com