 |
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 03:10 AM
|
#11
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
F8BOE <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:
>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> slower.
>>
>> Any ideas why?
>>
>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>
>No, because we don't know if you use 32 or 64 bits
32 bits.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 03:11 AM
|
#12
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
Pete Puma <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:
>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> slower.
>>
>> Any ideas why?
>>
>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>
>I think it's important to keep the same timing-pairs in the same paired
>slots.
>If you're using the older ram mixed with new RAM, try with just 2 gigs of the
>new stuff in slots 1+3 or 2+4 and time it. I'd be curious if it went
>quicker. On the second reboot I'd bet it runs quicker.
I've used matched pairs. Both pairs bought together from
the same vendor.
>Plus--you have an Asus. You can overclock it a bit easily...
Yes. I know. But it is taking linux a lot longer to
go through the startup lists.
Once booted, the machine seems as fast as usual though.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 03:13 AM
|
#13
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
paul_0090 <> wrote:
>On 2008-12-01, Paul J Gans <> wrote:
>> Bill <> wrote:
>>>In article <ggviap$ldu$>, says...
>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>> slower.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas why?
>>>>
>>>> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>>>> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> If it takes X amount of time to chexk 1GB of ram, don't you think it
>>>would take 4X that amount of time to check 4GB of ram?
>>
>> No no. I'm talking about the time to boot linux, not the time
>> the bios spends mucking about.
>>
>>>Pus, if your
>>>using 4 sticks of ram most motherboards will slow down the speed of
>>>the ram.
>>
>> That's something I shall check out. Thanks.
>>
>I did read, at one point, that some MB don't like ram on the last 2 slots,
>i.e the "2nd bank"; you might want to verify that is what is causing the
>slowdown. It's the reason that I got 4 gb on 2 sticks, upgrading from
>2 gb; of course the ram had come down much in price & with a very good
>rebate (it was to be for $10 but got a check for $25).
Another good point. When I get a chance I'll yank 2 gigs.
The machine lives in a fairly inaccessible corner and I
can't just drag it out without some preparation.
Besides, I couldn't be typing this if the machine was
turned off... ;-)
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 03:18 AM
|
#14
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
Bill <> wrote:
>In article <gh173u$svi$>, says...
>> Bill <> wrote:
>> >In article <ggviap$ldu$>, says...
>> >> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>> >> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>> >> slower.
>> >>
>> >> Any ideas why?
>> >>
>> >> The machine is running 10.3 with up-to-date patches.
>> >> The motherboard is an ASUS P4C-800E.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > If it takes X amount of time to chexk 1GB of ram, don't you think it
>> >would take 4X that amount of time to check 4GB of ram?
>>
>> No no. I'm talking about the time to boot linux, not the time
>> the bios spends mucking about.
> Ah. Details count. Boot up to me means from the time you hit the
>power button till the time you enter your name and password.
Sorry.
>>
>> >Pus, if your
>> >using 4 sticks of ram most motherboards will slow down the speed of
>> >the ram.
>>
>> That's something I shall check out. Thanks.
> Also there may be a setting in the bios involving PAE that may or
>may not help. Also maybe this will help:
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/2450
I'll check in the bios, but I don't think so.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 03:18 AM
|
#15
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
Baron <> wrote:
>Paul J Gans wrote:
>> marrgol <> wrote:
>>>On 2008-12-01 03:31, Paul J Gans wrote:
>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>> slower.
>>
>>>Which part of the boot process is slower? If it's before
>>>Linux kernel loads, then you might try to look for a "Quick
>>>Boot" option in your mo-bo setup and enable it - as Bill
>>>wrote, testing 4GB of RAM takes longer than 1GB. If it's
>>>Linux that loads slowly then make sure you are using
>>>kernel-bigsmp and not kernel-default.
>>
>> I'm talking about booting linux, not the bios stuff.
>> The machine is not a new one. It has been running linux
>> for some years. A few days ago I decided to change the
>> RAM in the machine from 1 Gb (two 512Mb sticks) to 4 Gb
>> (four 1 Gb sticks).
>>
>> The slowdown became instantly obvious. I allow the various
>> booting messgages to flow over the screen. In the past I
>> could barely read them as they "flowed" too quickly. Now
>> I can read and reread them as they "ooze" by.
>There are a great number of mainboards that get slower when you put in
>second, third and fourth sticks. Use memtest to see the measured
>speed !
Thanks. That's ugly, since the manual makes no mention of it.
__________________
--- Paul J. Gans
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 11:59 AM
|
#16
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
In <MPG.239dfc20330bc933989ad0@localhost>, on 12/01/2008
at 01:51 PM, Bill <> said:
> Ah. Details count. Boot up to me means from the time you hit the power
>button till the time you enter your name and password.
What is the reset button, chopped liver? To say nothing of shutdown with
reboot.
__________________
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to
|
|
|
|
12-02-2008, 11:21 PM
|
#17
|
|
Guest
|
Re: Fun Problem
Paul J Gans wrote:
> Baron <> wrote:
>>Paul J Gans wrote:
>
>>> marrgol <> wrote:
>>>>On 2008-12-01 03:31, Paul J Gans wrote:
>>>>> I've just increased the memory in one of my machines
>>>>> from 1 Gb to 4 Gb. And now the boot process is notably
>>>>> slower.
>>>
>>>>Which part of the boot process is slower? If it's before
>>>>Linux kernel loads, then you might try to look for a "Quick
>>>>Boot" option in your mo-bo setup and enable it - as Bill
>>>>wrote, testing 4GB of RAM takes longer than 1GB. If it's
>>>>Linux that loads slowly then make sure you are using
>>>>kernel-bigsmp and not kernel-default.
>>>
>>> I'm talking about booting linux, not the bios stuff.
>>> The machine is not a new one. It has been running linux
>>> for some years. A few days ago I decided to change the
>>> RAM in the machine from 1 Gb (two 512Mb sticks) to 4 Gb
>>> (four 1 Gb sticks).
>>>
>>> The slowdown became instantly obvious. I allow the various
>>> booting messgages to flow over the screen. In the past I
>>> could barely read them as they "flowed" too quickly. Now
>>> I can read and reread them as they "ooze" by.
>
>>There are a great number of mainboards that get slower when you put in
>>second, third and fourth sticks. Use memtest to see the measured
>>speed !
>
> Thanks. That's ugly, since the manual makes no mention of it.
>
I assume you mean the mainboard manual ! I've never seen memory
slowdown mentioned either. I assure you it does occur even with
matched pairs and/or paging turned on or off.
Memtest will show you the speed whilst its testing. If you make a note
and change the configuration, run memtest again you will see !
__________________
Best Regards:
Baron.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|

© 2004 - 2009 sysadminforum.com
|